|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Who is poor in Wisconsin?<< previous FAQ | Back to FAQs Home | next FAQ >>
Table 1 gives model-based estimates of poverty and median income figures from the 2005 U.S. Census Bureau's Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) for Wisconsin counties. The Center on Wisconsin Strategy (COWS) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison publishes a biennial report, The State of Working Wisconsin, that is a statistical portrait of work and well-being in the state and includes poverty statistics. The most recent publication in this series is 2006. Another recent COWS report focuses on the city of Milwaukee, which has higher rates of concentrated poverty than any other part of the state, and is Moving Outward: The Shifting Landscape of Poverty in Milwaukee. Using 1999 Census data, COWS mapped Wisconsin poverty rates by census tract (see map below) and for Milwaukee County (see detail). (In 1999, poverty in Wisconsin was 10.7 percent.) Welfare reform in Wisconsin, known as Wisconsin Works (W-2), is the subject of intensive and ongoing research by IRP affiliates. One multidisciplinary study examined the well-being of women leaving welfare in Wisconsin; another examined families on welfare in Dane County. Results of a three-wave survey of Milwaukee families and W-2 have been published. Currently available reports for all these studies may be found on the IRP Web site under Welfare Reform: Wisconsin Studies. The Child Support Demonstration Evaluation is a multiyear experimental evaluation of the child support policies that were a unique aspect of the Wisconsin reforms. The Midwest Welfare Peer Assistance Network (WELPAN) is a network of senior welfare officials from Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin which has been regularly meeting since 1996 to discuss how to make welfare reform work. IRP coordinates WELPAN’s meetings, which are funded by the Joyce Foundation. IRP has many publications which focus on poverty in Wisconsin and programs to address it; among them, the following publications provide a good introduction: Hotz, V. J. and Scholz, J. K. Can Administrative Data on Child Support Be Used to Improve the EITC? Evidence from Wisconsin. 2005, 28 pp. DP 1310-05. http://www.irp.wisc.edu/publications/dps/pdfs/dp131005.pdf Wu, C. F., Cancian, M., Meyer, D. R., and Wallace, G. How Do Welfare Sanctions Work? 2004, 35 pp. DP 1282-04. http://www.irp.wisc.edu/publications/dps/pdfs/dp128204.pdf Corbett, Thomas. Understanding Wisconsin Works (W-2). 1996. Focus, 18[1], 53-54. http://www.irp.wisc.edu/publications/focus/pdfs/foc181-3.pdf
|
About IRP | Research | IRP Initiatives | News & Events | Publications Links | FAQs | Site Map | Search IRP | IRP Home Please take a minute to evaluate our site: IRP Web Site User Survey |
| Questions and comments email irpweb@ssc.wisc.edu Posted: 6 December, 2004 Last Updated: 29 January, 2008 |